Former Meta Executive Accuses Company of Compromising U.S. Security

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) has announced significant cuts to funding for universities and research centers, prompting widespread criticism from the scientific community. According to the NIH, the new policy will impose a 15 percent cap on "indirect" costs linked to research, which currently can reach up to 60 percent for some institutions. This change is projected to save over $4 billion annually.
Critics, including Matt Owens, president of the Council on Governmental Relations, argue this decision will jeopardize vital research on diseases such as cancer and Alzheimer's. Owens emphasized, "This is a surefire way to cripple lifesaving research and innovation." Jeffrey Flier, former dean of Harvard's medical faculty, noted that the cuts will likely disrupt ongoing biomedical studies.
The White House defended the action, stating it aligns indirect cost rates with those used by private foundations. However, researchers warn that essential tools and support services necessary for scientific inquiry will be compromised. The impact of these reductions is anticipated to be most severe at prestigious institutions like Harvard, Yale, and Johns Hopkins.