Biden's Last-Minute Pardons Spark Controversy Across Political Spectrum
In a dramatic finale to his presidency, former President Joe Biden issued a series of last-minute pardons to family members, former officials, and participants in the January 6 Capitol attack investigation. The pardons, which were granted just half an hour before Biden's term ended, have provoked strong reactions from both sides of the political aisle.
Among those pardoned were Biden's brother James Biden and his family, former Joint Chiefs of Staff Chair Gen. Mark Milley, Dr. Anthony Fauci, former Congresswoman Liz Cheney, and several members of the January 6 select committee. Biden stated that the pardons were intended to protect his family and allies from possible retaliation by the incoming Trump administration, which is anticipated to issue its own pardons for those involved in the Capitol riots.
Senator Eric Schmitt, a Missouri Republican, criticized Biden's actions, alleging that they undermine presidential norms and the Constitution. Meanwhile, Fauci expressed gratitude for the pardon, stating that he has committed no crime and is a target of politically motivated threats.
The former president's actions have reignited debates about the legitimacy of pardons used as protective measures, potentially paving the way for extensive future pardons by Trump and subsequent presidents. Some Democrats lament that Biden’s blanket pardons for family and allies may undermine the party's criticisms of Trump’s willingness to engage in political corruption.
Rachel Vindman, the wife of a key witness in Trump’s impeachment inquiry, voiced her feelings of betrayal over the lack of pardons for her family, underscoring the divisive atmosphere surrounding Biden's final decisions in office.
As political leaders and the public react to these unprecedented pardons, the implications for the future of the presidential pardon power and its potential exploitation remain a subject of controversy.
Weekly Newsletter
News summary by melangenews